The Boston Globe has an amusing piece today about the different American and British meanings for pants: “trousers” here and “underpants” there. No sign yet of the Britishism getting any traction in these parts. If that does ever happen, it will kick the venerable expression “keep your pants on” up a few notches.
Top Posts & Pages
- 587,488 hits
- If your writing has a wordiness problem, put up a sign where you work: "It's the economy, stupid" 1 day ago
- The @BBCr4today piece on Britishisms in US with me and @lynneguist now skedded for Wed. Bumped by "Breaking news" (aka Becks bombshell?) 1 day ago
- Given the great entertainment @theofficenbc has given me, I'll watch #finale in real time. Well maybe not "real time" but at least same day. 1 day ago
- I cannot imagine a better song than 'How About You?" How about you @PeterSokolowski ? 1 day ago
- RT @BeowulfLeothwyr: "American spelling is awful, it should be spelled 'colour' ". Actuelic it scylde bē speled 'blēo', ðu Normann swīne. 1 day ago