I have noted the New Yorker’s insistence on having its writers use the British “had got” instead of American “had gotten.” But the magazine seems to have kicked things up a notch; now, people being quoted are required to use it as well. In an April 25 profile of Reed Krakoff, CEO of Coach Leather, Krakoff recalls a period when “I had got poison ivy on my hands.”‘ I submit that every American, of which Krakoff is one, would have said gotten. Anyone disagree?
Top Posts & Pages
- 819,755 hits
- RT @heidilande: Which Side Are You On? @byagoda examines the "wrong/right side of history" phrase as early as 1903 #linguafranca http://t.c… 1 day ago
- How many times does someone have to be called "underrated" before they're not underrated anymore? 1 day ago
- RT @dancow: Instead of emphasizing read time, NYTNow should emphasize "Walt Bogdanich wrote this so just sit down and read it" http://t.co/… 1 day ago
- On being on the right, or wrong, side of history chronicle.com/blogs/linguafr… 1 day ago
- RT @AndyRichter: SHOW BIZ SECRETS® 85% of being "funny" is saying "I found that out the hard way!" a lot. 1 day ago